Glitrende oppsummerings-tråd fra @forteller om hva som gikk aldeles galt med dagens #dax18-snakkis. https://t.co/4PFQE8lfwt
— Doremus Schafer (@DoremusSchafer) March 19, 2018
Jeg vet ikke hvor mye norske journalister allerede følger rådene i denne tråden, men jeg er helt sikker på at de kan og bør gjøre det _mer_ https://t.co/V7v4naSTds
— Doremus Schafer (@DoremusSchafer) December 13, 2018
'It is infuriating to come home from a secure hospital, suicidal, to…thousands of people saying that all you need to do is ask for help – when you’ve been asking for help and not getting it." – really important & honest piece from @ladyhaja #mentalhealth https://t.co/U7VWRNPXWK
— Helen Undy (@helen_undy) July 1, 2018
No matter what someone else does, no matter the harm or the blade or the word, they cannot reach, or touch the important parts of you: that which is most fundamentally you, and eternal. Hold onto that part, and let it light the way out of any darkness that comes your way. https://t.co/NYGQvt8PZw
— J. Michael Straczynski (@straczynski) June 7, 2018
— Doremus Schafer (@DoremusSchafer) January 28, 2018
Really, really smart take on what journalists need to do now to build/rebuild trust & connections with readers, including #freelancers https://t.co/SxudYApBZj
— MichelleRafter (@MichelleRafter) January 1, 2018
My new essay for @Wired on how "It's the Golden Age of Free Speech"—except our ideals and battles about "free speech" are now about *attention*, not speech. Besides, can you even believe your lying eyes? It may all be fake. https://t.co/kPY8tII6VJ pic.twitter.com/IvJKpNJrhJ
— zeynep tufekci (@zeynep) January 16, 2018
— Doremus Schafer (@DoremusSchafer) January 28, 2018
Tips till tidningsredaktioner (inte bara UNT): Ni kan inte växla sant mot snabbt. Det kommer alltid finnas de som bryr sig mindre om fakta och de kommer alltid vara snabbare.
— Mediebruset (@Mediebruset) February 14, 2018
0/ I gave testimony today to the Knight Commission on Trust, Media and Democracy. I talked about an emerging approach to the production of trust in news. It's not standard now, but will, I think, become such over time. It has 9 or 10 interlocking parts, which I will now describe.
— Jay Rosen (@jayrosen_nyu) February 20, 2018
Så korleis møter vi denne strategien? Eg aner ikkje. Har ikkje sett noko som har funka hittil. Hittil har vi prøvd å peike på det absurde i situasjonen med varierandre grad av utropsteikn. Meiningsmålingane er stadig stabile.
— Morten Elster (@MortenElster) March 10, 2018
Kom igjen, bare fortell oss sannheten så vi kan bli ferdige med denne saken og legge den bak oss: Hvem av dere var det som sendte den meldingen til Navarsete? pic.twitter.com/ha9TNRMd30
— Doremus Schafer (@DoremusSchafer) June 14, 2018
Innerst inne ønsker jeg meg også en MeToo-kampanje i psykiatrien. Jeg frykter dog at ingen står klare til å ta imot varslerne. Jeg vet et par ting om hvordan det er å si fra om urett og overgrep og ikke bli tatt på alvor. Vi må snakke om sånt:https://t.co/rkQvJgsJG1
— Merete Nesset (@MereteNesset) June 16, 2018
This in depth look at the Stanford prison experiment convincingly argues that it was an unethical and unscientific stunt misrepresented to the world for decades by the lead researcher – essentially, a lie https://t.co/Q6Y4CAkx0v
— Ole Rogeberg (@olerogeberg) June 14, 2018
Needless to say, through modern eyes these characters come off as not so much yuppie morons, as exceptionally tuned-in and prescient geniuses.
— Bad at Social Media (@thatstheendofme) July 4, 2018
Attempting to replicate doesn’t mean you’re out to get someone.
— Chris Holden (@profcjholden) July 6, 2018
The Internet Teaches You Things https://t.co/eNWuDTHJA0 I've been on the internet for a long time. This blog has been around since 2004! That's positively ancient in internet-years.
Over the past few days — not prompted by anything in particular — I've been reflected on some…
— David Schraub (@schraubd) July 31, 2018
— ysabel (@ysabelgerrard) August 29, 2018
To All The Papers I’ve Loved Before I Read the Methods
— Colin J. Carlson (@ColinJCarlson) September 10, 2018
….i motsetning til denne _merkelige_ kreasjonen i papirutgaven, der man ikke bare har gjort greia med å legge to grafer med helt ulike (og ulikt trunkerte) y-akser oppå hverandre, men attpåtil latt x-aksen (tidsaksen) løpe _motsatt vei_ for de to grafene! pic.twitter.com/fO2CusbSqJ
— Doremus Schafer (@DoremusSchafer) October 4, 2018
Han blir fratatt retten til å bestemme selv for så å miste mulighet til innsyn i hvorfor han er fratatt retten til å bestemme selv med begrunnelse i at han er fratatt retten til å bestemme selv. Paradokset er fullkomment. https://t.co/TAPY3dA9Sa
— Cato B Ellingsen (@catobellingsen) October 10, 2018
My fave tutor at uni had a great journalism 101 lesson: “If someone says it’s raining & another person says it’s dry, it’s not your job to quote them both. Your job is to look out of the f**king window and find out which is true.”
— Sally Claire (@Klujypop) July 14, 2018
Jeg overlevde ikke på grunn av fritt sykehusvalg. Jeg overlevde fordi jeg fikk en sårt tiltrengt plass helt i tolvte time, på et psykiatrisk sykehus i nærheten. Jeg hadde ikke vært i stand til å ta toget til Modum. Jeg var enestående heldig. Men jeg er ikke enestående. #nrkdebatt
— Ingeborg Senneset (@Ingeborgborg) November 1, 2018
Det var et problem at folk ble gående lenge på AAP uten avklaring eller oppfølging, derfor har man endret reglene slik at de blir gående uten verken AAP, avklaring eller oppfølging. pic.twitter.com/NYW0exiakg
— Doremus Schafer (@DoremusSchafer) December 8, 2018
Worshipped language can’t undo
Damage time has done to you:
Even your peremptory trust
In words alone here bites the dust.— Seamus Heaney (@HeaneyDaily) December 10, 2018
I first interviewed him in 1985 when I was 18 years old. I interviewed him at least a dozen times more over the decades. Each time I found him a voice of humane wisdom. Here is our 2016 encounter https://t.co/h0HMDCaIWj
— Jonathan Freedland (@Freedland) December 28, 2018
